Created: 19 September 2007 | Watched by: 9 people | Comments: 0 comments

Full text Tags only [Clear search]

[Spam reported - thank you]

• Add to my
  bookmarks

  Add comment

  2 groups
  1 person
  

  Letter: The case for carbon capture | Environment | The Guardian 

  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/mar/20/carbonemissions.oil

  Like George Monbiot, I too am dismayed by how carbon capture has been used as a smokescreen to confuse the public over the outrageous plan to build a new coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth, but this ... is not an excuse to condemn the technology itself (Carbon capture is turning out to be just another great green scam, March 18). In 2005 BP proposed to build a new gas-fired power station at Peterhead, capture the carbon dioxide produced and use it for enhanced oil recovery in the Miller field below the North Sea; this innovative project could have been up and running in 2009. Monbiot is wrong to suggest that the plan would have led to more carbon emissions than savings: between 1.8m and 2m tonnes of carbon dioxide would be injected each year over 20 years, producing an additional 40m-60m barrels of oil. Taking the higher numbers, 40m tonnes of carbon dioxide remains underground, while burning the oil produces approximately 20m tonnes; twice as much carbon dioxide is stored than emitted   [More...] [Less...]

  First added: 20 March 2008, by: Peter Foord  [Report as spam]

  Average rating (2 ratings):

  1 2 3 4 5

  Tags:  carbon capture, climate change

• Add to my
  bookmarks

  Add comment

  3 groups
  3 people
  

  George Monbiot: Carbon capture is turning out to be just another great green scam | Comment is free | The Guardian 

  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/mar/18/fossilfuels.carbonemissions

  Carbon capture is turning out to be just another great green scam Cleaner technology is possible, but Labour plans to introduce it so slowly that any benefits will be lost in higher coal output 'Coal is ... so clean and fresh that the prime minister brushes his teeth with it, Downing Street said last night. Mr Brown said advances in coal technology meant it was now one of the cleanest substances on Earth, and an unrivalled remover of stains and scaling." So says the satirical website the Daily Mash. The real claims are scarcely battier. Ministers are about to decide whether to approve a new coal-burning power station at Kingsnorth in Kent. This would be the first such plant to be built in Britain since the monster at Drax was finished in 1986. As well as coal, it will burn up the government's targets, policies and promises on climate change. John Hutton, the secretary of state in charge of energy, has started justifying the decision he says he hasn't made. "For critics," he argued last wee   [More...] [Less...]

  First added: 19 March 2008, by: Peter Foord  [Report as spam]

  Average rating (2 ratings):

  1 2 3 4 5

  Tags:  climate change, carbon capture, carbon, green, offsetting , carbon trading   [More...] [Less...]